0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»çÀüµ¿ÀÇ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÇ»ç, °£È£»ç ¹× ȯÀÚÀÇ Àνİú °æÇè

Comparison of Perception and Experience of Informed Consent among Physicians, Nurses and Patients

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2008³â 14±Ç 2È£ p.59 ~ 70
KMID : 1004620080140020059
¾È¸í¼÷ ( An Myung-Sook ) - µ¿¾Æ´ëÇб³º´¿ø

¹ÎÇý¼÷ ( Min Hye-Sook ) - µ¿¾Æ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: Purposes of this study were to promote understanding on mutually informed consent by comparing and analyzing the perception and experience of informed consent among physicians, nurses, and patients.

Method: Participants in the study were 145 physicians, 300 nurses, and 178 patients from eight hospitals in Busan. To examine their understanding and experience with informed consent, all participants responded to a questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS/PC 12.0 program.

Results: On the necessity of informed consent, the affirmative percentages were 95.9% for physicians, 99.0% for nurses and 84.8% for patients. As to the most important reason for informed consent 47.6% of the physicians and 64.3% of the nurses answered ¡®because it is an occupational and ethical duty¡¯, while 46.6% of the patients answered ¡®because it is protection for physicians¡¯. Regarding the legal decision maker for informed consent, 33.1% of the physicians, 27% of the nurses, and 42.1% of the patients answered that the legal decision-making right belonged to the ¡®patient¡¯. The agreement rate on the necessity of providing a comprehensive explanation about informed consent was 89.0% for physicians, 98.3% for nurses, and 96.1% for patients.

Conclusion: Most physicians, nurses, and even patients have inaccurate perceptions and inappropriate experience with informed consent.
KeyWords
»çÀüµ¿ÀÇ, ÀνÄ, °æÇè
Informed consent, Perception, Experience
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)